These awards have surely made antitrust academics and practitioners more alert to the value of writing well, with attention not only to substantive analysis but also to clarity and economy of presentation.
Our field is blessed with an erudite academy and an intellectually sophisticated bar; the Concurrences Awards bring out the best in both. Focusing on these metrics instead blinds us to the potential hazards. They have helped to spread competition law insights and knowledge throughout the world.
The Antitrust Writing Awards consist of: The Judicial Council may establish additional reporting or quality control requirements consistent with Sections toinclusive, of the Business and Professions Code. We believe that a fundamental measure of our success will be the shareholder value we create over the long term.
They have helped to spread competition law insights and knowledge throughout the world. The Jury consists of a Board, an Academic and a Business Steering Committees composed of the leading academics and counsels. The article was quoted at length in the opinion.
The Antitrust Writing Awards Jury contributes to this achievement by selecting the best writings published in But the consumer welfare approach to antitrust is unduly narrow and betrays congressional intent, as evident from legislative history and as documented by a vast body of scholarship.
Through this strategy, the company has positioned itself at the center of e-commerce and now serves as essential infrastructure for a host of other businesses that depend upon it.
Click here to see the Jury. To have our work not only recognized, but recognized by board members whose work we respect so much and by institutions with so much credibility, is a rare and delightful treat.
Instead, I claim that seeking to assess competition without acknowledging the role of structure is misguided.
This value will be a direct result of our ability to extend and solidify our current market leadership position. This not only rewards the authors, but also is very helpful for practitioners, because it highlights the most interesting and influential papers from an increasing flood of publications that is more and more difficult to follow.
All errors are my own. The Antitrust Writing Awards showcase the very best in antitrust writing over the past year, and participating in this process helps keep me updated on developing enforcement trends in the fast-pace and ever expanding world of antitrust and competition law.
But more importantly, the undue focus on consumer welfare is misguided. Strikingly, the current approach fails even if one believes that consumer interests should remain paramount.
Ponzi Scheme or Wal-Mart of the Web?
I was very pleased and surprised that my article on global antitrust compliance was selected in the Cross Border business category. Congress, as well as state legislatures, viewed predatory pricing as a tactic used by highly capitalized firms to bankrupt rivals and destroy competition—in other words, as a tool to concentrate control.In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation, Case No.
mdJZ. The Court has certified a class in this lawsuit. In so doing, the Court has not ruled on the underlying merits of any of the claims or defenses made by either side in this case.
The Sections offer members a greater voice in the programs of the State Bar and up-to-date information on developments in particular fields of law. Published on an ad hoc basis, usually when there is a significant event, legislative change or court judgment which we feel is important to update our clients and contacts about.
Clients throughout the world seek the advice of our antitrust lawyers. They count on our extensive experience in litigation against governmental authorities or private parties, counseling on delicate questions and comprehensive worldwide coverage of merger control regimes.
The Awards Jury comprises the Board, the Academic and Business Steering Committees, the Editorial Committee and the Readers. Each of these contribute to the Awards selection process. The Editorial Committee of the Institute of Competition Law selects a pool of articles based on Steering Committees members suggestions.
The Antitrust Writing Awards & Ranking featured an Academic Steering Committee with 26 leading US and EU professors (NYU, Georgetown University, King’s College.Download